State v. Latson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Kilbane, Judge.
Appellant Michael Latson challenges the determination by Judge Michael J. Corrigan ordering him to serve consecutive sentences without first determining whether his crimes were allied offenses of similar import. The state contends that Latson waived his right to appeal when he made no objection on that subject at the sentencing and that if any error arose, it was harmless because the facts clearly support the holding that aggravated robbery is a separate offense from kidnapping. We agree with Latson, vacate the conviction, and remand for a hearing on the allied-offense issue.
On…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ComenOhio Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. AyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. DouseOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Sullivan v. Whitten, Unpublished Decision (8-24-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000