Legal Opinion

State v. Douse

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2000No. 76069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John T. Patton, Judge.

Defendant-appellant John S. Douse (“defendant”) appeals the sentence imposed on him by the trial court based on (1) the erroneous imposition of consecutive sentences, (2) the failure of the trial court to make the required findings before imposing consecutive sentences, and (3) “imposing a disproportionate, illegal and otherwise unjust sentence.”

On July 9,1998, defendant was indicted for seven counts of rape with a sexually violent predator specification; seven counts of corruption of a minor; six counts of gross sexual imposition; twenty counts of illegal use of a minor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. KentOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. LatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DouseOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API