People v. Palacios
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
We hold that the sentence enhancement provisions of Penal Code section 12022.53 are not limited by the multiple punishment prohibition of Penal Code section 654. Section 12022.53 prescribes substantial sentence enhancements for using a firearm in the commission of certain felonies. Here, three enhancements were imposed Under subdivision (d) of that statute based on a single shot fired at a single victim during the simultaneous commission of three qualifying offenses. The Court of Appeal held that punishment on all but one of these enhancements must be stayed pursuant to the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. WimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. AhmedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.