Legal Opinion

Marshall-Wells Co. v. Kramlich

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1928No. 4799PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This suit was instituted against appellants for judgment on a written guaranty signed by said parties, given to secure credit for Leader Hardware Company, Ltd., a local concern. From a judgment based upon the verdict of a jury, this appeal was taken after a motion for a new trial had been denied. The assignments of error, with their various subdivisions, present fifty sundry and specifically alleged grounds for reversal of the judgment. For the purposes of this…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Finnegan v. NoerenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Rankin v. CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Harrill v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jolley v. Idaho Securities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Conley v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Allen Steel Supply Co. v. BradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Weed v. Idaho Copper Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Chevron Chemical Co. v. MechamDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API