Legal Opinion

Federal Power Commission v. Union Electric Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 7, 1965No. 123PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Section 23 (b) 1 of the Federal Power Act2 requires any person desiring to construct a dam or other project on a nonnavigable stream, but one over which Congress has jurisdiction under its authority to regulate commerce, to file a declaration of intention with the Federal Power Commission. If the Commission finds that “the interests of interstate or foreign commerce would be affected by such proposed construction,” the declarant may not construct or operate the project without a license. The issue here is whether the construction of a pumped storage hydroelectric project generating energy for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. New England Power Co. v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Fuel Safe Washington v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API