Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Renee

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1953No. 33248Published

1Dissent

Taft, J.,

dissents for the reason that the decision in the instant case is entirely inconsistent with the decision rendered by this court in Roberts v. Briscoe, 44 Ohio St., 596, 10 N. E., 61, and also with the sound reasons given by this court for that decision. See, also, Torrance v. Torrance, 147 Ohio St., 169, 70 N. E. (2d), 365, and Stream v. Barnard, Exrx., 120 Ohio St., 206, 211, 165 N. E., 727, 64 A. L. R., 1144.

Verbsky v. Burger, 146 Ohio St., 235, 65 N. E. (2d), 695 (where plaintiff claimed as heir against defendants who defended as heirs of same decedent and plaintiff was prevented…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Koerner Lodge, No. 6, Knights of Pythias v. Grand Lodge, Knights of PythiasIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Prince, Exrx. v. AbersoldOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Stream v. BarnardOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Totten v. Estate of MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Verbsky v. BurgerOhio Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API