Legal Opinion
Stream v. Barnard
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1929No. 21281PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The parties are in the same relative position here as in the trial court.
This is an action against an executrix to recover money claimed to be due the plaintiff from the estate of A. C. Barnard, deceased, upon two causes of action.
The first cause of action is for the sum of $5,-372.18, with interest, claimed to be due the plaintiff from such estate upon a sale by the plaintiff to the decedent of his interest in a certain business, at the price of the investment of the plaintiff in such business.
The second cause of action is for the sum of $632, premiums on insurance issued to the decedent by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Comstock's Admr. v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Curry v. CurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Pratt v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- Sheetz v. Hanbest's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. HumphrysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- In Re Estate of ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Goehring v. DillardOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Carter v. Curlew Creamery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Smith v. BarrickOhio Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.