Legal Opinion

Andrews v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 1, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

Tbe sum of $500.00 was not deposited by Colonel Andrews or accepted by tbe Ealeigh Savings Bank and Trust Company as a savings deposit, subject to tbe control of Colonel Andrews as a depositor. Tbe receipt signed by an official of tbe company and delivered to Colonel Andrews, for the plaintiff, although written in a pass book, shows tbat it was tbe intention of both Colonel Andrews and tbe company tbat said sum should be held by tbe company as a trust fund, and, with interest, should be paid to tbe plaintiff upon bis arrival at tbe age of twenty-one years, or if tbe plaintiff, who was at tbe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First & Citizens National Bank v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Flack v. . Hood, Comr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Corporation Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. In Re Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. In re Garner Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Nelson v. Illinois Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  2. South Penn Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  3. Parker v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Brookshire v. Hood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Hensley v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API