People v. Lakenan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. George Samuels, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturteyant, J.
Under an information filed by the district attorney the defendant was accused of grand larceny. The jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty as charged in the information. The defendant moved for a new trial; the motion was denied, and the defendant has appealed.
The fifth point made by the appellant is the one which he stresses in his brief and in his argument. In that point he claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial in the face of the fact that he presented two affidavits which tended to establish his defense, an alibi. The correctness or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Oberlander v. Fixen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. Sing YowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. LapiqueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. KirchnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- State v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. LedbetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.