Legal Opinion
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 21, 1994No. Civ. 92-1621-BUPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES M. BURNS, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case calls upon me to become a gaming master 1 and, as part of that task, to distinguish why gambling can be a godsend for the Grand Ronde, an economic boon for the Cow Creek and Coquille, but seriously detrimental, if not fatal, for the Siletz Tribes. 2
For a score of years, I have been importuned to be a forest master, see Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. v. United States Forest Service, 659 F.Supp. 1441 (D.Or.1987); a herbicide master, see Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides v. Lyng, 673…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2359, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4500, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4231, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7480 Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. United States of America United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs John D. Leshy, and United States of America United States Department of Interior Tom Sansonnetti Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Department of Interior Ada E. Deer, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Interior for Indian Affairs, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, and John Kitzhaber, Governor of the State of Oregon State of Oregon, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Advocates for Effective Regulation v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Constitutional Limitations on Federal Government Participation in Binding Arbitration, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1995
- The Constitutional Separation of Powers Between the President and Congress, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1996