Legal Opinion

Canney v. Sisters of Charity

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1942No. 28726PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

On the theory that the wife’s injuries were the proximate result of administrative negligence of defendant, plaintiffs, a marital community, brought this action to recover against defendant (a charitable corporation which operates Providence hospital as a charitable institution) for injuries claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff wife while a paying patient in defendant hospital. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the injuries sustained

“. . . were the sole, direct and proximate result of the administrative negligence of the defendants, which consisted solely of the failure of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Sisters of St. FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bise v. St. Luke's HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ratliffe v. Wesley Hospital & Nurses Training SchoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Miller v. MohrWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Ware v. CulpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Roanoke Hospital Ass'n v. HayesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  4. Weiss v. Swedish HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Clampett v. Sisters of Charity of the House of ProvidenceWashington Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API