Finch v. Weiner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The plaintiff claimed and offered evidence tending to prove that a collision between a truck owned by the defendant and operated by his employee, one Skinner, and a sedan, owned by one Hoskings, in which the plaintiff was riding as a guest, was caused by negligent operation of the truck, and that the plaintiff was injured thereby. At the beginning of the presentation of evidence by the plaintiff, Skinner was called as a witness and was inquired of, only, as to whether, at the time of the collision, he was in the employ* of the defendant and engaged in his business, and to identify an accident…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richmond v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Hurlburt v. BussemeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Goodno v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Finken v. Elm City Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Roberts v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Waldron v. RaccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.