Legal Opinion

Finch v. Weiner

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The plaintiff claimed and offered evidence tending to prove that a collision between a truck owned by the defendant and operated by his employee, one Skinner, and a sedan, owned by one Hoskings, in which the plaintiff was riding as a guest, was caused by negligent operation of the truck, and that the plaintiff was injured thereby. At the beginning of the presentation of evidence by the plaintiff, Skinner was called as a witness and was inquired of, only, as to whether, at the time of the collision, he was in the employ* of the defendant and engaged in his business, and to identify an accident…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richmond v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Hurlburt v. BussemeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Goodno v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  4. Finken v. Elm City Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  5. Roberts v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. Waldron v. RaccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  5. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API