Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Remer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 12, 2002No. 02-0210PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

An Iowa attorney admittedly engaged in a long course of self-dealing but claims he violated no rules of professional responsibility because he did not harm anyone. The Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics and Conduct filed a complaint with our Grievance Commission against respondent, George Remer, alleging he violated several ethical rules and recommended we suspend Remer’s license to practice law for three years. Our review is required by Iowa Court Rule 35.10 (2002). We agree with the Commission’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction.

I. Background…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PostmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. OehlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. ShermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard J. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. IA SUP. CT. ATTY. DISCIPLINARY BD. v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API