Harshman v. Armstrong
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clinton Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This action was brought by the appellant to recover from the appellees contribution, on account of money *127paid by him as a co-surety with them. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint and final judgment rendered on the demurrer. Proper exceptions were taken.
The error assigned is in sustaining the demurrer.
Two of the appellees, Armstrong and Douglas, filed an answer of the statute of limitations, in which they allege that the appeal was not, as to them, commenced and prosecuted within three years from the rendition of the judgment, to which the appellant filed a reply of two paragraphs:
1. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lytle v. LytleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- McDonald v. MagruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Vore v. HurstIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Drake v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Hancock v. RitchieIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smythe v. BoswellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- McCormack v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Tate v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Houck v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Knopf v. MorelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.