Legal Opinion
Mixon v. Contract Callers, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 24, 2021No. 1:20-cv-02069Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHERYL MIXON, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 20-cv-02069 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland CONTRACT CALLERS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Cheryl Mixon (“Mixon”) brings this putative class action against Contract Callers, Inc. (“Contract Callers”) pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (“FDCPA”). Contract Callers has filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. 12). For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.