Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. Cupp
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Adams Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The appellee’s horses entered upon the appellant’s railroad track at a point where it was not fenced, and were killed by the engine and cars. This action was brought to recover their value.
The cause was put at issue by the general denial, tried by the court, which, at the instance of the appellant, made a special finding of the facts, stated conclusions of law, and rendered judgment against the appellant.
The only question in controversy is whether or not the appellant was required by law to fence its track at the point where the horses entered upon it.
From the facts as found by the court, it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KneadleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. RowlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Cincinnati, Richmond & Fort Wayne Railroad v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. TrettsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. DickeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Cleveland v. VincentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. SevcekNebraska Supreme Court · 1904