Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Sevcek

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1904No. 13,655Published

Error to tbe district court for Howard county: Charles L. Gutterson, Judge.

1Opinion

The following opinion on rehearing was filed December 7, 1906. Reversed:

Letton, J.

In the former opinion in this case, ante, p. 793, it was held: “Where a railroad company outside of the limits of a city, town or village has established a flag station, with platform, elevator, office and scales, coal house, corn-cribs, etc., for public use, it is not bound, under the provisions of the statute requiring railroads to be fenced, to fence its road in such a manner as to prevent the public from having proper access to its station grounds.” It was further held: “The failure to fence is excusable,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Chouteau v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Cole v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. FranklinIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. CuppIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API