King v. Pate

Nichols, Judge.

1. The evidence adduced on the trial of the case showed that no “renewal” lease was ever executed by the parties, and while the defendant testified that he prepared a new lease for the plaintiff to sign (this lease was not in the record), he stated his purpose in preparing the lease as follows: “As to why I prepared a new lease and took it around there to get Mr. Pate to sign it; well, I prepared it for the one purpose *501of having at least five more years in the same location, for the period from July 1, 1961, until ’64 or ’65; in order that I would have in that same location…