Legal Opinion

King v. Pate

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 21, 1959No. 37611Published

1Opinion of the Court

99 Ga. App. 500 (1959)

109 S.E.2d 282

KING

v.

PATE.

37611.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided April 21, 1959.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1959.

James Maddox, for plaintiff in error.

James B. Langford, contra.

NICHOLS, Judge.

1. The evidence adduced on the trial of the case showed that no "renewal" lease was ever executed by the parties, and while the defendant testified that he prepared a new lease for the plaintiff to sign (this lease was not in the record), he stated his purpose in preparing the lease as follows: "As to why I prepared a new lease and took it around there to get Mr. Pate to sign it; well,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. Brooks Simmons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Sterchi Bros. Stores Inc. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Hooks v. LeaseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. King & Prince Surf Hotel Inc. v. McLendonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API