Legal Opinion
Fluidigm Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ionpath, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 28, 2021No. 3:19-cv-05639Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 FLUIDIGM CORPORATION, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, No. C 19-05639 WHA 12 v. 13 IONPATH, INC., ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 Defendant. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 Cross motions for summary judgment dispute the validity of asserted patents and their 18 infringement by certain accused products. The technology at issue, mass cytometry, involves 19 analysis of biological tissue samples via mass spectrometry. The properly construed claims 20 preclude literal infringement and patent owner has abdicated its burden under the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.