Bulova v. E. L. Barnett, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the City Court of the city of New York refusing to strike out denials in the separate defenses of the amended answer and certain allegations therein and to make more definite and certain other allegations.
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
The complaint, after alleging in its 1st and 2d paragraphs the incorporation of plaintiff’s assignor and of defendant, proceeds in the 3d paragraph to recite that plaintiff’s assignor at the special instance and request of defendant performed certain work of an agreed and reasonable value. In the 4th *152paragraph it alleges that plaintiff’s assignor “ for a valuable consideration ” duly assigned said account to the plaintiff; in the 5th that “ on or about August 31st, 1918, and subsequent to the aforementioned assignment, the plaintiff duly notified defendant thereof ” and demanded payment; in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Sheridan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Cragin v. . LovellNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.