Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bracero

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1979No. 2386 and 2481PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

The instant separate appeals, taken on behalf of brothers Frank and Ralph Bracero, raise the question of whether they were denied effective assistance of counsel due to a conflict of interest during their joint trial for aggravated assaults they allegedly perpetrated on Angel and Geraldo Rolon. The relevant facts are as follows:

In April, 1976 an altercation between the Braceros and Rolons arose at a baseball field and resulted in the Rolons being bludgeoned by baseball bats. According to the Rolons the culprits were appellants Ralph and Frank Bracero, and their father Manolin.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. United States ex rel. Hart v. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. DockinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API