Menezes v. WL Ross & Co.

Brian P. Menezes (Petitioner) argues that the court of appeals erred in its analysis of when a claim for breach of fiduciary duty accrues under Delaware law. We disagree. The court of appeals performed a knowledgeable and perceptive analysis of the instant case. However, our review of Delaware law leads us to a different conclusion regarding the efficacy of Petitioner’s claim. Thus, we affirm the court of *526appeals’ decision in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Factual/Procedural History

Petitioner served as the chief financial officer (CFO)…