Ida M. Kale and Lester E. Kale v. Martin F. Douthitt, and Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of America
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUTLER, District Judge.
This action was brought by plaintiffs to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in the collision of two automobiles. At the conclusion of all the evidence, defendants renewed their motion for a directed verdict on the ground that there was not sufficient evidence of actionable negligence on the part of the defendants to be submitted to the jury. The motion was allowed, and the plaintiffs appealed.
The principal issues involved in this appeal are a question of last clear chance and also whether the testimony of an expert witness in reconstructing the accident and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Fishman v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Richter v. SeawellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
- Johnson v. KellamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Greear v. Noland CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Hickox by and Through Hickox v. HollemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Lester v. RoseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- Theodore A. Harris, Father and Next Friend of Patrick Harris, a Minor v. Richard D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Grasty v. TannerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.