Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Bledsaw

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1966No. Civ. 501PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (R.M.), J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment, entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury, in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident. His motion for a new trial was denied. The named defendants are the adverse driver, Paul David Bledsaw, and his employer, Ens Building Supply. The word “defendant” as used hereinafter shall designate the defendant-driver Bledsaw.

Plaintiff’s appeal is based on three grounds: That there is no substantial evidence to support the implied finding of the jury that the defendant was not negligent; error in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tripp, Inc. v. Kenneth A. Murray Insurance, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API