Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Manning

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2009No. 2006-0738 and 2008-0037Published

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} These causes came on for further consideration upon the filing of applications for reinstatement by respondent, Thomas Joel Manning, Attorney Registration No. 0059759, last known business address in Dayton, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 22, 2006 in case No. 2006-0738 wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. ManningOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ManningOhio Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API