Legal Opinion
Ames v. Attorney General
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 11, 1955PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.
These are petitions in this court brought respectively for a writ of mandamus and for a writ of certiorari by the same petitioners against the Attorney General. The petition for a writ of mandamus is reported by the single justice upon the amended petition and upon the respondent’s motion to dismiss and demurrer. The petition for a writ of certiorari is reported by the single justice upon the amended petition and the respondent’s substituted motion to dismiss, demurrer, and return as extended.
The pleadings with the exhibits appended thereto or incorporated therein are voluminous and detailed.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Newman v. United States Ex Rel. FrizzellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brewster v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Boyne v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Kaplan v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Maffei v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Ruth Frick Rice v. The President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Commonwealth v. FavulliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.