Legal Opinion

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided May 14, 2012No. Docket Nos. 21976-07, 10075-08UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

P purchased an interest in a foreign corporation in 1996. A separate foreign shareholder held an interest in the foreign corporation that was four times greater than P's. The foreign corporation's business activities were effectively limited by its articles of incorporation and a shareholders agreement to include only the purchase of contingent interest notes from the separate foreign shareholder.

Read the full summary

P purchased an interest in a foreign corporation in 1996. A separate foreign shareholder held an interest in the foreign corporation that was four times greater than P's. The foreign corporation's business activities were effectively limited by its articles of incorporation and a shareholders agreement to include only the purchase of contingent interest notes from the separate foreign shareholder. As part of P's acquisition of its interest in the foreign corporation, P contemporaneously purchased a put option from the separate foreign shareholder. The option gave P the right to put its shares…

1Opinion of the Court

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Comm'r

Docket Nos. 21976-07, 10075-08

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2012-135; 2012 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 134; 103 T.C.M. (CCH) 1736;

May 14, 2012, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

P purchased an interest in a foreign corporation in 1996. A separate foreign shareholder held an interest in the foreign corporation that was four times greater than P's. The foreign corporation's business activities were effectively limited by its articles of…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rutter v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017
  2. Celia Mazzei v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
  3. Devine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API