Legal Opinion
Rutter v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided September 7, 2017No. Docket No. 15480-14UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM J. RUTTER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Rutter v. Comm'r
Docket No. 15480-14.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2017-174; 2017 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 174; 114 T.C.M. (CCH) 282;
September 7, 2017, Filed
Decision will be entered for respondent.
Robert S. Horwitz and Edward M. Robbins, Jr., for petitioner.
Adam B. Landy, Thomas R. Mackinson, and Kaelyn J. Romey, for respondent.
LAUBER, Judge.
LAUBER
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
LAUBER, Judge: With respect to petitioner's Federal income tax for 2009, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS or respondent) determined a…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carlos Langston & Pamela Langston v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
- Charles E. Bercy, Elaine Bercy, Successor in Interest, and Elaine Bercy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
- Devine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Devine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership, Dynamo, GP, Inc., Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.