Legal Opinion

Whitman v. Whitman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 2, 1932No. 6 Div. 158PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The answer and cross-bill set up the facts that the insured reserved the right to change the beneficiary; that he gave written notice to each of the insurance companies of his intent and purpose to change the beneficiary to his wife, the appellee; that he delivered the policies to his wife as the new beneficiary; that he, caused a register to be made of his policies and recorded the fact that he had changed the beneficiary in the policies to his wife; that the companies understood and treated the policies as having changed the beneficiary. The appellant insists that this was but a conclusion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Arrington v. Grand Lodge of Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  4. Holt v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Norton v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Taylor v. Southern Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Gibson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API