Legal Opinion

Norton v. Norton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 20, 1966No. 7 Div. 743PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This appeal involves a contest between an insured’s first wife and his widow over the proceeds of two insurance policies in both of which the first wife was named beneficiary. The trial court found in favor of the widow and we affirm.

' O. K. Norton had a policy of insurance worth $5,500 with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company by virtue of his employment with Republic Steel Corporation, and one worth $1,921 with Gulf Steel Young Men’s Christian Association Mutual Benefit Alliance.

The $5,500 certificate of insurance under the group policy for employees of Republic Steel was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Lamar v. LamarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Great American Insurance v. Railroad Furniture Salvage of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Patterson v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Lott v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Dennison v. ClaiborneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Mustell v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Gibson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API