Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1984No. Nos. 83-1263, 82-1615 and 82-1620PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
In the primary case the parties are Lang-don L. and Reece D. Morgan against Mobil Oil Corporation, whereas in No. 82-1615 the caption is Anadarko Production Company v. Taylor, et al. These cases, because of their similarity, were consolidated for the appeals. Apparently there was a good deal of primary preparation in both instances, and indeed, the facts are not in dispute and the cases were disposed of by the trial court on motions for summary judgment.
The question which is involved in each of these cases is the interpretation to be given to a number of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southland Royalty Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
- Jules J. Exnicious v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Martin v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Quenzer v. QuenzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Jackson v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- David W. CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Barnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- All West Pet Supply Co. v. Hill's Pet Products DivisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.