Legal Opinion

Bird v. Kenworthy

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1954No. Sac. 6479PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The appeal of W. W. Bird is from an adverse judgment in an action to rescind a conditional sales contract and for the recovery of the amount he paid to C. V. Kenworthy, the vendor. Bird also asked for relief from a forfeiture which assertedly resulted in the unjust enrichment of Kenworthy.

In 1948, Bird and Kenworthy entered into a conditional sales contract and Bird took possession of the tractors described in it. The purchase price was approximately $29,500, of which $5,000 was paid at that time. Bird agreed to pay the remainder in monthly installments of $2,000.

Time was made the essence of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Baffa v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Quinlan v. JohnWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Roberts v. LebrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Honey v. Henry's Franchise Leasing Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Caplan v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Harriman v. TetikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Kudokas v. BalkusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API