Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-3321PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case was formerly employed by the Interstate Commerce Commission. He seeks “compensatory and punitive damages, reinstatement, transfer and backpay for the intentional, wanton and malicious violation of his constitutional rights under the First Amendment.” 1 Presently before the Court is defendants’ Amended Motion To Dismiss.

I. FACTS

Plaintiff was formerly employed as a special agent at the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) in Philadelphia. 2 In early 1976, at the request of Congressional investigators, plaintiff wrote a letter…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Luttrell v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  2. Metz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1989
  3. Lawrence v. United States of America Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Chronos Shipping v. United States Coast GuardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Persons v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API