Miglietta v. Kennecott Copper Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The complaint is framed to recover damages for breach of a written agreement for the exploitation, as a joint venture, of certain asbestos deposits located in Greece. Since a copy of the agreement is annexed to and made a part of the complaint, ‘ ‘ the rights and duties of the parties must be determined by the terms of the contract annexed to the com*58plaint, and not by the plaintiff’s characterization or construction thereof in his pleading.” (3 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 569.) “ [T]ke rights of the parties thereunder must be determined by the terms of that instrument without the aid…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Manacher v. Central Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mobinco Brokerage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- 805 Third Ave. Co. v. M.W. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dember Construction Corp. v. Staten Island MallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Sagamore Corp. v. Diamond West Energy Corporation and Howard F. BoversCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Quatrochi v. Citibank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Wright v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005