Legal Opinion

Miglietta v. Kennecott Copper Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 8, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The complaint is framed to recover damages for breach of a written agreement for the exploitation, as a joint venture, of certain asbestos deposits located in Greece. Since a copy of the agreement is annexed to and made a part of the complaint, ‘ ‘ the rights and duties of the parties must be determined by the terms of the contract annexed to the com*58plaint, and not by the plaintiff’s characterization or construction thereof in his pleading.” (3 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 569.) “ [T]ke rights of the parties thereunder must be determined by the terms of that instrument without the aid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manacher v. Central Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mobinco Brokerage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 805 Third Ave. Co. v. M.W. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Dember Construction Corp. v. Staten Island MallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Sagamore Corp. v. Diamond West Energy Corporation and Howard F. BoversCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. Quatrochi v. Citibank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Wright v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API