Legal Opinion

Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1929No. 27,314PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.. Appeal by plaintiff from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint.-

Defendant is an independent' school district of this state. Plaintiff was a pupil in defendant’s high school. He was injured at a football game conducted by the. district as a part of its educational system. The charge is that defendant’s officers and agents negligently used unslaked lime to mark the lines on the football field and thereby created a nuisance; that plaintiff was one of the players in defendant’s school team; and that during ther game he was thrown to the ground and his head and face forced…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Benton v. Trustees of the City HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Emmons v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Ackeret v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Keever v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Storti v. Town of FayalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API