Talge Mahogany Co. v. Lindner Interior Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Grand Rapids; Stuart, J. Assumpsit by the Talge Mahogany Company against the Lindner Interior Manufacturing Company for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff is engaged in manufacturing lumber and veneers in Indianapolis, Ind. The defendant is engaged in the manufacture of interior wood finishing in Grand Rapids. The suit was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due for lumber and veneers furnished. The defendant pleaded the general issue and gave notice of recoupment. The case was tried before the court without a jury. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the case is brought here by writ of error.
*607Upon the trial the following stipulation was filed:
“It is stipulated and agreed herein that the following facts are true, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neumann v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Shotwell v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Lobdell v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Thompson v. HomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889