Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Homan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

This suit was an action in assumpsit for work and labor of the plaintiff alleged to have been performed for the defendant, a portion of which was charged for by the hour, at 40 cents per hour, and the other service is charged for by the week, at $25 per week, and for which the plaintiff claimed he had such an agree*135ment with the defendant. A set-off was noticed under the general issue pleaded by the defendant.

The cause came to the Kent circuit by appeal from a justice’s court. TJpon the trial in the circuit, which was had before the court without a jury, the plaintiff obtained judgment for…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Talge Mahogany Co. v. Lindner Interior Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API