Legal Opinion

Lobdell v. Baldwin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintifi brings error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Tbis cause was tried before tbe court witb*570out a jury, and findings of fact and law made. Judgment was rendered .in favor of the defendants.

It appears that on September 9, 1889, the parties to this suit, together with M. D. Baldwin and J. B. Rhodes, formed a copartnership under the name of Baldwin, Rhodes & Co., and engaged in the manufacture and sale of saw swages. They continued in business to April 6, 1891. The plaintiff was acting in the capacity of agent for the firm in the sale of swages, and was to receive a com-mission from the firm of 33£ per cent, upon all swages sold by him, after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Learned v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Young v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. Citizens Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Talge Mahogany Co. v. Lindner Interior Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Towle v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API