Legal Opinion
Kenneth L. Nord v. The Black & Decker Disability Plan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2004No. 00-55689PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Supreme Court has vacated our opinion in Nord v. Black & Decker Disability Plan, 296 F.3d 823, 828 (9th Cir.2002) and remanded for further proceedings. See Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord, 538 U.S. 822, 123 S.Ct. 1965, 155 L.Ed.2d 1034 (2003).
Kenneth Nord challenges the decision of Black & Decker Disability Benefits Plan (“Black & Decker” or the “Plan”) to deny Nord’s application for thirty months of disability benefits. The district court upheld the denial of benefits. We reversed and held that when making benefits decisions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Kenneth L. Nord v. The Black & Decker Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Vicki Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Wible v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Shaw v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Lundquist v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Firestone v. Acuson Corp. Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.