Legal Opinion
Lundquist v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 30, 2005No. CV 02-9602FMOPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REVERSING ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION RE: ERISA BENEFITS
OLGUIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is a claim for the recovery of benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. For the reasons set forth below, the administrative decision to terminate benefits is reversed.
PROCEEDINGS
On December 17, 2002, plaintiff Lorene Lundquist (“plaintiff’ or “Lundquist”) commenced this action by filing a “Complaint For Breach Of Employee Retirement Income Security Act Of 1974” (“Complaint”), asserting that her disability benefits…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Vicki Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- McDaniel v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schwarzwaelder v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Daghlian v. Devry University, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Gallupe v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs. Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca Cola Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Garrison v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.