Legal Opinion

Phariss v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1942No. 22032PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion- states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with a violation of the local option liquor laws, and by the jury fined $100.00, hence this appeal!

The State’s Attorney before this court has briefed this cause in a manner that we think disposes of all matters raised herein, and we adopt such brief as our opinion, as follows:

“There are a number of bills of exception, but they all relate to the same subject. In this case the contention is made that there was no information on file at the time of the trial, which occurred on the 23rd of September, 1941, because there was no file mark. The first bill of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stalcup v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Milstead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Birdwell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. Queen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Birdwell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. Birdwell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API