Birdwell v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Dissent
JOHN HILL, Justice (Assigned),
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider Bird-well’s plea, since our record affirmatively reflects that the information upon which the prosecution was based was not filed until after Birdwell entered his plea.
Presentment of an indictment or information to a court invests the court with jurisdiction of the cause. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 12. An information is considered presented when it has been filed by the proper officer in the proper court. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 12.07. (Vernon 1977). In this case…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Montalvo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Ancira v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Phariss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.