Stalcup v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The offense charged is that the appellant, being the proprietor of a public amusement, namely, a theater, permitted it to be open for the purpose of amusement on Sunday and permitted the display of a theatrical performance, namely, a motion picture exhibition, for which .an admission fee was charged, punishment a fine of twenty dollars.
The evidence seems to sustain these averments. A recital of it is deemed unnecessary.
The court heard evidence on the motion to quash the information and is not shown to have been in error in overruling it. The complaint and information…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Arbetter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Goodman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Anthony v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Phariss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Aleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.