Legal Opinion
Jack and Julie Truesdale v. William Dallman and Dorothy Arn
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1982No. 81-3517, 81-3518PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a denial of habeas corpus relief by Senior District Judge David S. Porter. The petitioner/appellants, Jack and Julie Truesdale (the Truesdales), were indicted by the Butler County, Ohio, Grand Jury on one count of aggravated trafficking in drugs, a violation of O.R.C. § 2925.-03(A)(5). Following a jury trial at which they were represented by counsel, the Truesdales were found guilty as charged.
At trial, and again on appeal to the Ohio Court of Appeals (1st District) and Ohio Supreme Court, the Truesdales have argued: first, Ohio law requires, as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walker v. DoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Weaver v. Shopsmith, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- MTD Products, Inc. v. RobatinOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Walker v. DoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002