Legal Opinion
Warburton v. Thomas
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 20, 1992No. 92-509PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
This consolidated interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Superior Court (Manias, J.) involves two constitu*385tional issues, which were first raised below in separate petitions for declaratory judgment. The parties seek rulings on the constitutionality of the passage of House Bill 1026 by the legislature over a gubernatorial veto and on the constitutionality of the bill itself.
The first action, Warburton v. Thomas, involves an interpretation of part II, article 44 of the New Hampshire Constitution. The question presented for review is whether the long-standing practice of the New…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Bablitch & Bablitch v. Lincoln CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- New Hampshire Municipal Trust Workers' Compensation Fund v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In re BelowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Judicial Retirement Plan v. SEC. of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State Employees' Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.