People v. Vicencio
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
From the judgment on a verdict of guilty of the crime of rape as charged in the information deféndant has appealed on the grounds: (1) that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict; (2) that the verdict was contrary to law; and (3) that the court erred in admitting certain evidence over the objection of the defendant.
The prosecuting witness was a child of the age of thirteen years. She and her mother lived in the city of Benicia with the defendant and his son, who was approximately the same age as the prosecutrix. Defendant was employed as a watchman at the United States Army…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. StanglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. HaywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Omans v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.