People v. Beal
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Defendant was charged in count I of an information with having accomplished an act of sexual intercourse with and upon Margaret, and in counts II and III with having eommited the same offense upon Luressie. A jury-convicted him of the offense charged in count I, and acquitted him of the offenses charged in counts II and III. He appeals from the judgment rendered and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.'
As grounds for reversal defendant contends that: (1) the verdict is unsupported by the evidence; (2) the testimony of the complaining witness is inherently improbable;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. TalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. StanglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. EdgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. BainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.