Legal Opinion
Townsend v. Melody Home Manufacturing Company
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 30, 1975No. 47290PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.
This action arose when Melody Home Manufacturing Company (Melody) reneged on its promise to pay a sales incentive bonus to one of its dealers, T-Bar-W Mobile Homes (T-Bar-W), after the latter had earned it by purchasing nearly one hundred thousand dollars worth of mobile homes in 1972.
T-Bar-W’s petition, filed in May of 1973, alleges that it purchased from Melody 14 mobile homes in 1972 in the total amount of $92,732.65, and that these purchases were made pursuant to Melody’s bonus plan. 1 Therefore T-Bar-W alleges, it is entitled to its “bonus percentage” of 1½ percent of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stovall & Strickland v. McBrayerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Chilton v. Oklahoma Tire & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Gwinn v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Rogers v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Seal v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Murphy Oil USA Inc v. Trivental IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Vince Allen & Associates, Inc. v. Delhi Gas Pipeline Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Everett A. Holseth & Company, a Texas Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Richard A. Cline, Intervenor v. Everett A. Holseth & Company, a Texas Corporation, and John Does, I Through LxxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.