Legal Opinion

Luttrell v. Panozzo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 17, 1993No. 1-90-3330PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DiVITO

Following a hearing on a rule to show cause, plaintiff Richard Luttrell was found in indirect civil contempt for violating an order restraining him from telephoning or coming within 100 feet of defendant Judy Panozzo and he was ordered to pay a fíne of $2,000. On appeal, he contends that the circuit court improperly applied the preponderance of evidence standard rather than that of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We agree, and for the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

On August 2, 1990, plaintiff filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In Re Marriage of LogstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In re Marriage of BettsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Harvey v. CarponelliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Gallo v. HenkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alderson v. Southern Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. In re Marriage of O'MalleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  3. People v. DavitAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Hutton v. Consolidated Grain and Barge Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Alderson v. Southern Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API